1/10/2024 0 Comments New lockdown california“It was utterly immoral to conduct this society-wide intervention without the evidence to justify it,” Bhattacharya says. But the outcome of this experiment was even more damning: Florida’s age-adjusted COVID mortality rate is lower than that of all but 10 other states. If Florida had simply done no worse than the rest of the country during the pandemic, that would have been enough to discredit the lockdown strategy. Ron DeSantis reopened businesses, schools and restaurants early and rejected mask mandates. Though tens of thousands of other scientists and doctors went on to sign the declaration, the press caricatured it as a deadly “let it rip” strategy and an “ethical nightmare.”įortunately, a few leaders adopted the focused-protection strategy - most notably, in Florida. They urged officials to divert more resources to shield the elderly while reopening business and schools for younger people. Kulldorff joined with Bhattacharya and Sunetra Gupta of Oxford to issue a plea for “focused protection,” called the Great Barrington Declaration. Democrats with their untested strategies caused more deaths among the elderly than COVID-19 ever could. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard, had a similar experience with his article, early in the pandemic, arguing that resources should be focused on protecting the elderly. Stefan Baral, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins with 350 publications to his name, submitted a critique of lockdowns to more than 10 journals and finally gave up. The inquiry found no evidence of wrongdoing, but the smear campaign sent a clear message to scientists: Don’t question the lockdown narrative.Įditors of research journals fell into line, too. Stanford University was so cowed by the uproar that it subjected the researchers to a two-month fact-finding inquiry by an outside legal firm. Merely by reporting data that didn’t fit the official panic narrative, they became targets of unfair online attacks by other scientists and the press. In April 2020, John Ioannidis, Jay Bhattacharya and other colleagues reported that the fatality rate among the infected was considerably lower than the assumptions used to justify lockdowns. We still have no convincing evidence that the lockdowns saved lives, but lots of evidence that they have already cost lives and will prove deadlier in the long run than the virus itself.Ī few scientists and public-health experts objected, noting that an extended lockdown was a novel strategy of unknown effectiveness. Ignoring their own carefully prepared plans for a pandemic, they claimed unprecedented powers to impose untested strategies, with terrible collateral damage. They misled the public about the origins of the virus and the true risk it posed. Instead of keeping calm and carrying on, the American elite flouted the norms of governance, journalism, academic freedom - and, worst of all, science. The second, and far more catastrophic, was a moral panic that swept the nation’s institutions. The first was a viral pandemic that killed about 1 in 500 Americans - typically, a person over 75 suffering from other serious conditions. The United States suffered through two lethal waves of contagion in the past year and a half. Liberals turn on Joe Biden over a traffic jamĭurham’s ‘chilling’ revelations, what RFK Jr. End legacy admissions, too, squad’s absurd attack on court and other commentaryĬDC boss’ utterly laughable exit warning on politicized ‘science’
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |